Political economy of foreign aid

5.1 introduction

The future of foreign aid is precarious. With aid in decline, violence in developing countries on the rise, and Western countries interests in global outreach increasingly uncertain, a new formula for relations between donors and aid receiving countries is evolving. Countries with the greatest need are also the ones most troubled by weak institutions and political upheavals. Such recipients need more effective governments. This demand is voiced in this volume’s papers and elsewhere. It fuels aid in support of state strengthening. The rise of aid for capacity building, governance and democracy, however, poses a major dilemma. On the one hand, institutional weakness is recognised as a major barrier to aid effectiveness. On the other hand, donor efforts to link aid to improved governance compete with recipients’ preferences to protect existing privileges. Weak states do not readily use aid to improve their polities or economy. The central task for the changing aid regime is to develop strategies to resolve this dilemma. The post-cold war aid regime requires a formula for aid that goes beyond conventional economic liberalism to support the strengthening of states burdened with failed institutions. As noted, the share of  GNP  that rich countries contribute to official development assistance is in decline, in some states for over twenty years. In spite of the increased generosity of some states, since 1992 net aid disbursements from  OECD  states

Remember that the share of  GNP  that rich countries contribute to official development assistance is in decline, in some states for over twenty years. In spite of the increased generosity of some states, since 1992 net aid disbursements from  OECD  statesdropped, falling from over $62 billion to less than $50 billion in 1997. Not surprisingly, this decline has spawned interest in what caused it and what will happen in the future. This chapter addresses these questions. Drawing on the earlier contributions to the volume, it explores conditions influencing future bilateral and multilateral aid, with principal attention to large donor states, since their outlooks shape  their own as well as multilateral flows.

In addressing these questions, this chapter focuses principally on political explanations. Previous chapters mainly addressed the economic dimensions of aid. They asked how its performance as an instrument for development could be improved. Only occasional attention was paid to political economy issues, such as how politics influences the allocations and results of aid. Yet some grasp of why richer countries are willing to transfer resources to poor countries is essential to any creditable forecast about future aid flows. Further, since aid supplies are contingent on results, and on the willingness of recipients to accede to aid conditions, the political motivations of those in control of recipient governments, as well as those with power in donor states, must be considered. Together these factors determine the allocation and use of aid.  In considering the causes of aid, and reflecting on what causal conditions support foreign aid, political economy perspectives are useful. A political economy perspective treats aid as a policy action of donors, to be explained by political and economic goals. These, in turn, are products of culture, institutions, power distribution and the dynamics of competitive interests (Gilpin 1987, Nelson 1990,  Cassen and associates 1994 and  Schraeder  et al. 1998).

There are various traditions in political economy, ranging from economic determinism and rational choice modelling to idea-grounded social  constructivism (Mueller 1997, Bates 1998 and  Staniland 1985). This essay draws on at least three approaches. In one, foreign aid is determined by the economic interests of powerful groups within donors.

Executive and legislative branches make economic policy with a view to its implications for their power. The second approach explains aid (bilateral and multilateral) as an effort to maximise benefits to donor states, deriving preferences for them from their situation in the international system. In the third aid is the outcome of bargaining among units, a kind of political market made up of donor aid bureaucracies, multilateral aid agencies and recipient government officials. All three help explain donor motivations. Since preference formation and estimation is controversial, this essay relies little on formal models or deductions from assumed interests. It uses historical language to speak of motivations and goals (not preferences and strategies), particularly for donors. Motivations are discussed as emergent properties from social context.

In the first approach, groups within states – e.g. parties, sectors, firms and  NGOs – press for various policies. Empirical evidence about how various unbundled components of a state see their interests affected by aid is the basis for explaining aid outcomes. Political leaders, interacting within executive and legislative branches set policy on levels and allocations of aid. Bureaucracies and personalities seek to improve their situation by strategic uses of aid; patronage and sort-term solutions often dominate choices (Nelson and  Eglinton 1993 and van de  Walle 1998).

In the second approach the state is a unified actor with interests. These interests arise from a state’s position in world affairs and its cultural values. Aid is used to advance interests, whether diplomatic, commercial or cultural. Because donors pursue multiple goals, and these vary over time and among donors, it is difficult to generalise about the weight these goals play in explaining aid. For example, economic gains seem important in Japanese aid, political goals in French aid and global welfare improvement in Nordic aid.

In the third approach, producers and consumers of foreign aid set terms (prices) by bargaining. Units remain states or government agencies, but in interaction. Donors want a bundle of outcomes in return for their aid. One outcome is from other donors. In this context they want burden sharing and co-ordination for achieving common goals. Among recipients, donors want compliance with their conditions. Recipients, of course, want aid without conditions. Donor–recipient exchanges can be considered strategic results of co-operative bargaining games. Acceptable outcomes for players are aid arrangements within each player’s win set, varying according to which side pulls the other closest to its preferred position (Putnam 1988).

As world political conditions change, foreign aid changes: both its size and purposes. There has never been a pure economic development assistance regime. Rather, foreign policy has created and sustained various aid regimes among donors (Grant and  Nijman 1998). Until 1990, cold war concerns provided a core motivation for aid. Recipient states did not fail because it was in the interests of the cold war combatants that they not fail. Development was a secondary concern;  rentier  elites were not obliged to account to donors for aid effectiveness in terms of economic or political improvements.

Now that the cold war is over, foreign policy is more geared towards international public goods, including containing international ‘bads’. Ironically, international  public ‘bads’ have multiplied as states once propped-up by strategically motivated aid are now openly failing. This situation provides a new focus for aid efforts. Donors should intervene in crisis situations so as to contain negative externalities and gear their assistance in normal times to  institution-building. In the short term, the donor objective is not higher economic growth in aid recipients; if it were, aid would go to countries with competent states and good policies, ones already relatively rich and able to attract private investment.ii  The priority for aid in the coming decade should be for institutionalising political stability, seeking the best package of long-term reduction in political crises and better future economic growth among states too risky for private sector funds. It is not an easy task.

 

5.2 Explaining the decline in aid

Explaining the change in aid volumes and especially its decline in the nineties begins with recalling how the system of foreign aid evolved over its first 50 years. The institutionalisation of foreign aid after the Second World War occurred in a context of the cold war. Welfare principles dominated economic policies of donors (Noel and  Therien 1995). Strategic political considerations were the major force shaping aid allocations, at least bilateral ones (Wood 1986 and  Ruttan 1996). While moral concerns underlay aid, especially emergency relief, this motivation was never paramount, certainly  not in a sustainable fashion.iii  These founding principles and regime features changed.  The demise of the United States as a hegemonic donor was reflected in the drop of  U.S.  aid as a per cent of  U.S.  GNP, from over 2 per cent in 1950 (not shown in the figure), to about 0.6 per cent in 1960-2, and only 0.08 per cent in 1997.

Multilateral agencies played a growing role in the regime, as the World Bank and the UNDP  facilitated co-ordination in aid administration, while the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the  OECD  encouraged more generous giving among its member countries, along with establishing guidelines for what counted as aid. From the sixties to 1992, the amount of official development assistance rose steadily, even taking inflation into account. It centred increasingly on impoverished countries, as successful developing states in Latin America and Asia ‘graduated’ as recipients. Japanese and European aid especially increased, surpassing  U.S.  contributions. Equitable development and economic reform became more central principles for justifying aid. Then, following the end of the cold war, with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, funding peaked and declined.

The decline in foreign aid occurred for six reasons. First, the end of the cold war made it less important. Second, globalisation attenuated aid tied to colonial interests. Third, growing budget pressures squeezed donor resources. Fourth, disappointment with the effectiveness of aid weakened popular support. Fifth, donor country special interest coalitions supporting aid unravelled. Finally, neo-liberal philosophies challenged some of the intellectual foundations of aid. A brief elaboration of these reasons follows.

5.2.1 Cold war ending

The end of the cold war reduced both aid and the ability of recipients to  manoeuver among donors. In donors most engaged in the cold war struggle, particularly the United States and the Soviet Union, domestic support for aid evaporated with the end of the global ideological clash. Predictably, among  OECD  members, the largest declines in aid since 1992 are reported for the United States, followed by close military allies Germany, Japan, Australia. The declines in aid from 1992 to 1998 for each of the  OECD countries corresponds fairly well to a rank ordering of countries in terms of the intensity of their involvement in cold war activities. The erosion of cold war motivations did not affect all these donors. In the eighties, for example,  nonaligned states, such as Finland and Switzerland, did not use aid for strategic purposes. They also avoided substantial decline in the nineties. Nominal cold war alignments, moreover, such as  NATO membership, is not a good proxy for strategic motivation of foreign aid.  Those states that accepted (and have reached and surpassed) the  UN  aid volume target (0.7 per cent of donor  GNP) in their national policy had both the least decline in terms of aid volume (Figure 19.2), in terms of their relative aid effort (Figure 19.1) and the least responsibility for the cold war world structure.

Figure 19.2

Aid from China and Russia, and other former communist states also declined. These states give little or no aid today. This decline, likewise, is a function, at least partially, of the cold war’s demise. Many of these states have become aid recipients. Their role in the aid drama today stands in striking comparison to their role from the 1955-80 era. Once significant contributors to the aid regime (Schraeder et al. 1998), these states now absorb billions of aid monies in efforts to transform their economies from command to market based ones and to encourage their peaceful transition into a global liberal economy (Grant and  Nijman 1998). The rise in aid to these recipients basically absorbed aid increases after 1989; since the mid-nineties this put pressure on the availability of development aid for traditional poor countries.

The case of aid to the Horn of Africa is instructive. In spite of large needs,  foreign aid has declined. From the sixties through the eighties, cold war alliances were the major factor shaping aid flows to that area. In the eighties Somalia and Sudan received large amounts of  U.S.  aid as a product of alignments. Ethiopia, following the rise to power there of Marxist military leaders, lost foreign aid from the West. Today, global alliances do not mobilise or direct aid.

In sum, the end of the cold war both reduced support for aid and loosened constraints on its use. From 1948 until 1991, the great risk to security from a war between the two large alliances caused each side to mobilise and use aid as a tool to shape relations with other states. Aid continues today for other reasons.  As security-based incentives declined, overall aid did not fall immediately; and for certain donors with commercial or global welfare interests aid grew.

5.2.2 Dying patron–client ties

A second reason for declining aid levels is the atrophying of international patron–client relations. Globalisation of economic and cultural production has subordinated links originating in earlier colonial ties and spheres of influence. For great powers, these ties, which pre-date the cold war, were important in justifying and allocating aid in the fifties and sixties. The desire of France and Britain to maintain economic and cultural links with former colonies, and similar desires by the United States with respect to areas it formerly governed or strongly controlled, such as the Philippines, Liberia and Panama encouraged aid that could provide direct budgetary support to friendly governments. The French focus on states in West Africa is particularly revealing. French ties to West Africa were not part of a strategic alliance, but represented the protection of historical investments in overseas peoples and expatriate residents. Aid supported a network ofcommercial and cultural links. The aim was to build political stability in those countries with which France shared historical and linguistic identities (Schraeder et al. 1998). A review of aid to six West African states in 1987-91 by the French ministry of cooperation concluded that ‘France’s development aid contributed to the reproduction of social economic and political systems that are  clientist and predatory.’ (quoted in Lancaster 1999: 121).

In the last decade these culturally based political and economic links have weakened as donor country firms responded to global and Europe-wide market imperatives. Popular interest in these overseas locales also waned as global humanitarian opportunities captured the attention of large  NGOs. A residue of support for client-maintenance remains; French aid continues to be concentrated, for example. The United States continues to give aid to countries with special ties, but without emphasis on maintaining solidarity of customs. A decline in client-oriented aid is notable in the case of the United Kingdom. It has loosened its targeting of aid to former colonies, reacting to a vocal development lobby and strong support of the Labour party. Portugal and the Netherlands also have historical ties that promote aid. Other donors have developed a target group of countries based on shared political philosophy, as in the case of Nordic states with Tanzania. The special sentiments linking particular donors and recipients, whatever their origin, have withered in recent years, especially as experiences of success dropped.

One result of this withering of sentiments is diminished aid to ‘client’ governments. This, in turn, has reduced aid’s role in stabilising these polities. Of course, this role is controversial. Aid to train police and military, or to bolster a particular set of officials, is of debatable value, witness such aid to Vietnam in the sixties or Somalia and Zaire in the seventies. Further, in Africa, where aid rose dramatically in the wake of fiscal crises,famines, and devastating civil wars in Uganda, Chad and Mozambique, more aid actually weakened the polity. The proliferation of donors with individual projects created a complex nightmare of planning, oversight, evaluation and negotiation in weak states. Donor demands overwhelmed government capacity.

Some political uses of aid to promote stability continue. For instance, aid still goes to help stabilise countries or regions, such as the Middle East, Eastern Europe or Southern Africa. Some aid may go as a bulwark against terrorism. Such flows are donor specific. U.S.  aid to Egypt and Israel and European aid to Eastern Europe and Russia stand out as examples. Japan’s aid to Asia may also play such a role, though it rests more on commercial and regional stability interests. Bilateral aid to prop up particular client states, however, is over (Ruttan 1996 and Lancaster 1999). Furthermore, multilateral aid is harder to use for state support, even though technical assistance from the World Bank or  UNDP  is specifically designed for capacity building. While multilateral agencies  are often more trusted by recipients, they are less able to exercise political conditionality, certainly overtly. Multilateral agencies have charters and governing bodies with strong respect for putative sovereignty. This inhibits aid used to prop up governments, or to force political reform. Their failure in this task has been broadly assailed (van de  Walle 1998).

5.2.3 Tight budgets

A third reason for the decline of aid is budgetary constraints. Many  OECD  governments reduced their aid in the nineties, at least from trend levels, a likely consequence of broader efforts to lower government deficits. Both domestic and foreign expenditures came under pressure. Military spending and foreign aid suffered cuts, many in absolute terms. Entitlement programs expanded, gaining a larger share of allocations, even as benefit levels for such programmes were tightened. Reasons for this tightening varied. Among European countries, the decision to meet the  Maastricht’s treaty’s criteria for entering the Euro-currency arrangement required substantial shrinking in budget deficits in the years leading up to January 1999.

Slow economic growth made the fiscal cuts required particularly painful. Some were dramatic. In Italy, for example, after large increases in aid budget pressures in the nineties, combined with disappointment about fraud and waste in projects, brought about a fall in Italian aid of over 50 per cent. In the United States, aid declines since the eighties can be linked to tax cuts and legislatively mandated caps on budget expenditures. Once the Clinton administration promoted a balanced budget goal, austerity across a large realm of discretionary expenditures ensued. In Japan, which became the largest single donor in 1992, aid declined by over 30 per cent from 1995 to 1996. The collapse of the balloon economy and the subsequent long recession explain a large part of Japanese aid downturn. The fiscal reform law of December 1997 schedules aid volumes to fall from 1997 levels by 10 peer cent a year from 1998-2000. In the face of this austerity, aid from conservative welfare states declined the most and from socialist welfare states the least (Noel and Therein 1995). Budget constraints also affected non-OECD  donors. Falling government revenues in oil rich Middle East states explain their budget induced decline. These countries, so heavily dependent on export revenues from oil, encountered budget crises in the nineties as world prices plummeted. Since the Gulf War, the flow of aid from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and other smaller neighbours has dwindled. At one time, in the seventies, these donors funded 5-10 per cent of total aid commitments. Today, there are few aid donors outside the  OECD. The small amounts of aid provided by countries such as Argentina, Taiwan and Brazil are dwarfed by other aid flows.

5.2.4 Performance

The fourth reason for the decline in aid volumes is disappointment with performance. Sometimes labelled ‘aid fatigue’, this factor is best understood as lack of satisfaction that aid is working. Aid has been seen to fail in many countries, especially in Africa. The failure of economic development in some countries, ones increasingly targeted for aid in the  eighties, was particularly disappointing. Some analysts blamed failure on donor governments, pointing out that they had undercut development results by giving priority to other donor state purposes, particularly political and commercial interests. There have long been critics of aid who doubted its efficacy.  More recently, critiques have suggested donors were culpable thanks to their support for bad economic policies in earlier years, e.g. helping  parastatal development in the sixties and seventies, coupled with insufficient attention to the impact of aid on recipient institutions in subsequent years (van de  Walle 1998).

Other damning attacks on donors arise from dependency theorists. They claim that aid is really provided in order to exploit recipient countries, with the effect of slowing development (Amin 1973 and  Seligson and  Passe-Smith 1998). This charge still resonates among some donor  NGOs and recipient country officials. Finally, after 50 years of experience, there is a massive accumulation of critical evaluations of aid, especially failed projects in Africa. These critiques informed much of the analytical work reviewed in this volume’s earlier chapters, including the influential work of the World Bank by  Burnside and Dollar (1997). In general, flaws in donor motivation, bureaucratic mismanagement and recipient country socio-political distortion of aid objectives were identified. The reaction to perceived aid failure has been to identify better ways to use aid more effectively. As  Eric  Thorbecke  illustrates, each successive decade has brought efforts to correct and improve aid. Domestic publics and  elites have absorbed some of the  skepticism raised by critics (Noel and Therein 1995: 547-48).

In Japan, for example, less than half the population in 1996 thought foreign aid benefited ‘developing countries’ while 15 per cent held it was of no benefit.  Fact finding missions by parliamentary bodies have raised concerns about ineffective results and misused resources. In the United States, after years of public discussion of such results, it is not surprising that in 1998 about half the population favoured giving no aid. While only 10 per cent of those considered ‘leaders held this sceptical view, leaders support for aid levels declined (Reilly 1999: 38). The decline in trust of government in many  OECD  countries might provide a more general reason for some of these views. In fact, for the  U.S.  population aid has never been viewed favourably. The portion of the public supporting it in principle ranged from 52 per cent in 1974 to 46 per cent in 1998 (Reilly 1999: 21). Disappointment with aid probably accounts for the downward shift in support for aid among leaders more so than other factors.

5.2.5 Smaller special interest payoffs

A fifth reason for a decline in aid support is that special economic interests in donors are less powerful. It can be argued, indeed is  argued, that aid has the most support from groups inside donors that derive selective advantage from it. These include firms with investments in recipient countries, or who provide exports tied to aid, and bureaucracies with employees with career interests in aid – including  NGOs. There has been an impressive growth in  NGOs in the last two decades, and they have developed strong ties to aid programmes that help fund them. Their growing strength creates a powerful lobby for continued government allocations (but, as the sixth reason suggests, their success reinforces a presumption that development can be addressed as a private sector responsibility).

Business firms with profits linked to guarantees or direct payment from an aid account also actively support aid levels in their home country. The growth of direct foreign investment, the development of alternatives to aid for increasing exportsales and  trans-corporate co-operation have reduced the salience of aid for most firms operating overseas or who are heavily export dependent. Moreover, there is a vicious cycle at work. Once the aid pie begins to shrink, the fewer domestic economic interests it will serve. In addition, there can be a decline in the lobbying weight of groups that historically supported aid, as their interest or their ability to shape  aid declines. Another reason why aid has weaker special interest constituencies is because the countries receiving aid have changed. As aid has shifted from Asia to Africa, and from fast to slow growing countries, the results sought in these recipients promise fewer political and economic benefits for export or financial interests within donors. Aid has less relevance as a way to open recipients’ markets if those markets have very small potential.

Exporters look to market benefits in large countries such as China or Nigeria, none of which receives significant per capita aid.  The decline of aid compared to direct foreign investment also reduced commercial interests support. The  IMF  is more effective than aid institutions in promoting their interests. A kind of downward cycle of support results. All these factors have made aid less relevant to donor country firms and bureaucracies. Ascendent neo-liberal outlook A sixth, and final, reason for lower aid volumes is the shift to neo-liberal views. In the global climate of opinion, the size and intervention of government has come to be considered excessive. Such views are dominant in western welfare states as well as socialist ones. The United States and Great Britain championed reduction of entitlement spending. This view, first fashionable in the eighties, became triumphant by the nineties, as the Soviet Union and China began to adopt market-oriented economic policies.xiv  As governments are less trusted and market solutions are celebrated, the use of governments to transfer resources globally has become decreasingly legitimate. Yet some motor for efficient progress is needed.  This is increasingly met by the rise in private capital flows and foreign investment, especially by multinational corporations. Such flows has grown remarkably compared to portfolio investment, short-term loans, or aid flows (and  Stopford 1998). Most of these funds, however, do not reach very poor countries, such as those in Africa, with the greatest gaps between needed and realised public investment. Yet these private flows do reduce support for the public system of aid that had supported international financial flows, especially World Bank  lending. With large capital flows occurring outside the  Bretton Woods institutions, and with the  concessional lending of the World Bank largely targeted to very poor states, such as those in Africa, aspirations about aid launching rapid growth, as it seemed to do for South Korea, Indonesia and Taiwan, have waned. Confidence in aid as an instrument has eroded. Its past association as a successful boost in the early years of Asian state-led development was undercut by the 1997-8 Asian crisis. The neoliberal creed in extreme form has no place for foreign aid as a public good; aid as charity should be voluntary, not tax based.  NGOs, successfully mobilising private funds, confirm this ideal.

The effect of this shift in ideas is manifest in the  programme of various political movements to cut ‘welfare’ both domestically and internationally. It can also be seen in concern about the  unsustainability of national entitlement policies. Deep scepticism about state solutions pervades analyses by individual states and multilateral agencies, such as the  OECD  and the World Bank. The solution to past aid failures is more marketoriented solutions. Ironically, privatisation as a solution does not exclude public funds to assist this process, even though logically this requires state management of the process and  Kahler 1988). Thus a broad shift in  world views about aid emerges from the ascendance of a neo-liberal orientation. In donor countries, a decline in national welfare has been matched by a decline in foreign aid (Noel and  Therien 1995). Such  judgments have been reinforced by the analysis of aid failures.

 

5.3 Four donor motivations

What support for aid is likely to exist inside donors for such future directions? Coalitions of internationally oriented populace, mobilised by political parties and the advocacy of  NGOs, will be particularly necessary to sustain aid, especially as development imperatives supplant earlier political ones. However, aid targeted on development goals must also relate to the self-interested motivations of donors. We know that the goals of donors in the contemporary state system have complex economic underpinnings. The political context faced by donors has great uncertainty about security and economic ‘interests’, as conventionally defined. Foreign policy goals centre on  combatting immediate disturbances, such as conflicts, emergencies and global environmental threats.

The difficulty in pursuing these goals suggests that a collective action problem is the basic barrier to sustainable aid. Benefits of aid are so dispersed that donor political interests are hard to marshal. Costs, such as taxes, are visible and divisible in comparison. How to overcome the collective action problem is complicated, to say the least; paths to doing so will vary according to the political system of various donors and the assets available to mobilise populations within their existing national creeds. Donors have four motivations for sustaining aid. These provide opportunities in various donors for mobilising support, domestically and  transnationally. They also represent desiderata shaping aids size, packaging and effectiveness. These are:

(i) the pursuit of global public goods,

(ii) economic development benefits for donors,

(iii) domestic special interests and

(iv) increased willingness of recipients to accept conditionality.

The first will draw on collective benefits from reduced violence, disease, pollution achieved by aid. The second will build on national self-interest in gains from trade and investment thanks to economic development. The third rests on interest group pressures and bureaucracies that organise and serve these. The last rests on what recipient countries are willing to do to get aid; they are likely to pay higher prices in terms of loss of implementing conditionality.

5.3.1 Global public goods

In the nineties threats to political and economic values have emerged from the rise in wars and conflicts, the financial instability in global markets seen in the Asian crises  and the increase in pollutants and diseases which flow across borders  Donor countries have an interest in reducing these threats. A more benign and secure global environment is a key donor goal to which aid can be attached. This goal is now widely cited by donors, both in general and in announcing specific commitments. The World Bank and many bilateral donors have a growing portfolio of projects to improve the environment, to secure better governance and to support strengthening financial sector regulatory capacity. An intellectual foundation for these initiatives rests on  a recognition of the importance of public sector institutions in providing frameworks. The domination of neo-liberal ideas, eschewing public sector intervention, is hence challenged by these global concerns (Gray 1998). The pendulum swinging toward neo-liberal philosophy has probably reached its apogee. Hence, the scepticism about aid it encouraged, seeing aid as an inappropriate welfare transfer, is offset by concern about international market failures, including states in collapse. Global public goods encourage aid as a way to build constraints against market excesses.

A wide variety of practices threaten global welfare. Dumping wastes in the ocean, cutting tropical forests, releasing carbon emissions into the atmosphere are all understood to create shared environmental losses to people around the world. The spread of infectious disease and other public health hazards also are preventable losses. Industrialisation and population pressures exacerbate these global ‘bads’, while the absence of regulatory mechanisms permits them. Some international paths to collective action have been designed, both through international treaties and via  transnational politics, the latter via international  NGOs that support environmental lobbying by local affiliates. Donor publics seeking these collective goods recognise aid as a tool. Its role includes reducing transaction costs of negotiations and inducing co-operation instead of free riding by having rich countries bear some of the costs of jointly beneficial actions by developing countries.

Analytically, there is an appealing case for increasing the supply of global public goods, from research to the environmental regulation, from financial arrangements to conflict reduction. A recent World Bank  World Development Report  (World Bank 1997a) stressed the role of the state for  improving action. With the rise in refugees and hot money, interest in dampening  destabilising flows of people and money is high. Donor government budgets have grown by billions of dollars to control the substantial rise in the last decade of flows of people and illegal substances that have fostered efforts to strengthen border controls, at least in Europe and the United States. Among political elites in donor states enhanced aid may also be attractive as a way to use international agreements to leverage desired national policies, for example, on trade or regulation of illegal economic activity.

With the waning of the cold war, defects in state institutions and their performance on issues of protecting natural resources and the environment have gained general visibility and mass appeal. Calls for intervention to offset bad effects in developing countries are striking. In addition, health threats, gender equity, pollution, hunger and poverty related suffering has built broad coalitions in donor states, spurred on by  NGO  actions, international conferences and  trans-governmental co-operation.

5.3.2 Economic development

A second goal motivating donors is the benefits they derive from economic development in recipient states. The earlier chapters in this volume make a strong case that aid has been, or at least can be effective in promoting development. For the  donor state as a whole, looking at its reasons to commit both bilateral and multilateral funds, there is near universal recognition that development will be linked to trade enhancement and expanded, more secure overseas investment opportunities. To care about such benefits, confidence in the efficacy of aid and development is needed. One explanation for earlier failures in development has been that foreign governments were, at least as perceived by public opinion in donors, resisting aid objectives. Tying success to adaptive and monitored project objectives and relating these to the prospect of accelerating development, are measures by which the decline in aid can be limited. Support for aid is also greater if the recipients are viewed as worthy. Success in achieving development in aid concentrated on ‘worthy’ states can reverse cynicism that has grown around the process (Kapur 1998 and Grant and Nijman, 1999). Amending aid practices to realise greater effectiveness involves greater country targeting, capacity building and improvement of bureaucratic management, as was earlier proposed as a supportable target when linked to economic performance.

The exact importance of economic development, to donors at least, is difficult to measure, through gains from trade from poor country recipients.xvi Among  OECD  states, the share of trade with such aid target states is small and not growing. The financial exposure of debt in these states is likewise small, even though these are countries with the highest debt burden relative to their economies. Economic development goals for aid may be inversely proportional to the size of a recipient. Were per capita aid to become significantly larger in countries with large populations – China or India, for example – the consequences for donor economies from aid accelerated growth would weigh far heavier. Aid could also be linked to smoothing global firm alliances. Political resistance in these countries makes this unlikely; hence the weight of development benefits are likely to come from accelerated growth in smaller countries. Moreover, the participation of these states in global economic affairs has diffuse value. In recent years, donors encouraged adoption of economic rules that are conducive to global capitalist growth and to increased trade, by these states. Membership of  WTO  virtually doubled. Countries such as France and the Nordic states abandoned support for state centred development models. This convergence of policy thinking on economic issues lowers global transaction costs. Aid reinforces this great transformation. Economic growth also improves realisation of donor goals for political performance (Przeworski 1998).

In sum, the shift of aid toward the most difficult development cases reduces direct benefits to the donor economies, but increases gains from a reduction of global burdens and threats which can be avoided by growth. Narrow donor interests distorting aid flows is sometimes blamed for poor performance. Past failures of aid have been explained by the allocation and absorption of aid according to non-economic factors that undermine its desired effectiveness on development. The appeal of developmentally focussed aid in coming years is that it could escape this distortion, accepting that aid to weak states must be  multi-dimensional to be effective.

5.3.3 Domestic coalitions

We have noted how unbundling the nation-state as a unit allows us to see how special interests within countries form coalitions to support various aid policies. These interests are substantial; the problem is putting together coalitions supporting diffuse goals. Virtually all donors link aid to domestic exports: either for commodities or services such as technical assistance. Inside donors, firms then compete to protect their share of benefits from a dwindling aid appropriation. Firms and sectors that see foreign aid expanding their incomes, lobby for aid appropriations. This varies depending on the influence such  groups command and the salience of aid for their profitability. Labour, for example, long a supporter of aid in  OECD  domestic politics, has gradually withdrawn support, especially as trade with developing countries is perceived as bringing pressure to keep wages low.  Sectoral influence on aid policy is nicely illustrated by food aid. This aid flow has long enjoyed strong farm sector support, most visibly in the United States. As the power of the farm lobby’s voting bloc has declined (as there are fewer farm voters and legislators), and as their interest in subsidising exports moved toward the solution of trade negotiations to gain more market access abroad, farm sector support of aid weakened.

In the case of food aid, humanitarian groups have become more important. While farm interests still join forces in support of appropriations for this tied form of aid, their importance has waned. Getting rid of  U.S.  and  EU  surpluses unduly drove the size and allocation of food aid and distorted aid effectiveness. This is one reason  Colding and  Pinstrup-Andersen propose giving the World Food Programme (WFP) a larger role in food aid management, because as a  UN  body is less subject to disposal pressures. The risk incutting ties with special interests, however, is that as selective benefits are lost, groups inside donors will lose interest in aid. This has occurred, as we noted, with regard to food aid; it is also the case with respect to financial sector support for aid (Haggard et al. 1993).

Domestic coalitions then explain differential support for types of aid; and they partially account for the variety of support aid enjoys among donors. Generally, the larger the aid package, the more benefits can accrue to specific firms or sectors in a donor country, and the more intensely these groups will build winning coalitions in budgetary struggles over scarce resources. Often support  coalitions form around particular components of aid that directly affects them. Universities lobby for the research and institutional strengthening lines in aid budgets. Contracting firms bid for airports and phone systems. Once shares of aid budgets are settled, however, these various special interests support the overall appropriation.

NGOs, such as church organisations and political parties are the most frequently used vehicles for articulating equity demands. Such groups have been strong advocates in donor countries for generous foreign aid. Thus, interest group politics is not exclusively grounded in selective economic gains. Every donor’s culture is saturated with various demands for justice, duties to others, requirements for national rectitude. Foreign aid from  OECD  states is justified by various formulas by which national responsibilities are met by providing aid. Among these are concerns for international welfare (or distributive justice) and for burden sharing among donors. In socialist welfare states, aid objectives continue to be especially visible in support of aid for reasons of national philosophy (Noel and  Therien 1995).

One player among such coalitions is the aid bureaucracy itself. Bureaucratic interests exist for all established agencies, which quite naturally seek to maintain themselves. Managing aid is a profession, and it attracts people committed to its goals. Not surprisingly they lobby to protect or increase their resources. Like physicians, they have a body of received wisdom about how to achieve the goals of aid, usually development. Multilateral institutions do this quite openly, with national citizens testifying to parliaments on behalf of appropriations. They promote allocations to their work by speeches, reports, and mobilisation of support from allies in other parts of government and the private sector. These bureaucracies have a limited ability to shape appropriations. This is true for both domestic based government  bureaus and multilateral agencies. Indeed,  many government branches – foreign affairs, trade, commerce and intelligence ministries, for example – weigh in to support aid. For them it is a complimentary resource for carrying out their tasks. Multilateral agencies, such as the World Bank and  UNDP  have officials who pursue aid promotion interests. They have lobbied through legislative testimony and personal networks in their home countries.

5.3.4 Increased concessions from recipients

A final motivation for donors is increased influence for each aid dollar. Historically, some recipient countries have shopped wantonly for aid, while others accepted aid only if it fitted with their own plans and preferences. Over time, however, except for the rapidly growing countries of Asia, recipients have moved toward, offering more concessions to donor preferences. Attitudes  are far more accommodating compared to twenty years ago. One reason for this is the loss of an option to switch among donors; with the end of aid from the Communist bloc, this has largely disappeared.  The ease with which Indonesia, Egypt and India resisted aid and policy pressures from the West in the sixties is over. Especially in Africa, recipient countries have become supplicants, trotting out a range of projects in hope to capture aid (Lancaster 1999).

As a result, donors can now bargain for more. Even elements crucial to power maintenance, such as corruption, may be open to concessions. Gaining support for international positions is less salient to donors compared to aid regimes of earlier years. They can now ask a higher policy and institutional price for their money. What donors can now demand in such circumstances, in return for aid, is for these standard ways of corruption to end. This is no easy request.  Corruption, associated with over-billing and capital flight can become institutionalised in the aid receiving country to the point that it would be hard to avoid a diversion of aid. However, corrupt predatory states now have difficulty raising revenues to pay the costs of government. Hence, government requires financing from foreign aid. In spite of donor policies eschewing the financing of ‘recurrent’ costs, this avenue opens a powerful path to address the state strengthening target. Given the importance of state institutions for development, as suggested, donor agencies may attempt to ensure future sustainability by demanding political reform of institutions  (North 1998).

Of course, changes in recipient attitudes are not simply bought by aid. When first China and, by the nineties, Russia became recipients, their orientations toward aid and development strategies had first shifted, thanks to internally driven forces. Official policy favoured market-oriented economic policy; aid was to support political liberalisation as defined by the recipient. Another event raising the malleability of recipients has been a rise in natural and man-made emergencies. These created growing demands for emergency aid. A third factor encouraging recipients to accept greater conditions was the end of options in finding alternative sources of aid. When famine came to North Korea in 1995 it led to large flows of aid from Western governments, mostly through the UN. Resistance to external influence abated, at least partially. In review, the last reason for sustaining or increasing donor motivation for aid is that recipients will be concede more in return. Broad concessions are possible, including an assault on society-wide corruption, an end to human and property rights violations, and the use of regulatory capacity to expose illegal public and private actions, such as tax evasion. The failures reported by Elliot Berg in  occurring in the privatisation process illustrate the importance of such changes.

Another area in which recipients might offer higher concessions is in the regulation of finance and the environment. Weak state authority has failed to cope with the rapid changes; opportunities for predation in the  globalised economy’s financial and raw materials markets grow (Ascher and Healy 1990). Indifference by the aid regime to these  problems, will leave the lessons of past aid unused. The result will be a further decline in moral anchors and, in the absence of norms for living in a highly  monetised society, anomie and a climate for corruption and social conflict will prevail.

 

5.4 Strategies for aid sustainability

The shift in the organising rationale for aid – from cold war rivalry, North–South paternalism and state-led development to globalisation and market-oriented growth – has contributed, along with tumbling aid levels, to a weakening of global authority (Hopkins 1995). This also unleashed new economic interests and cross-national alignments that affected bargaining within the aid regime. The underpinnings of aid, institutionalised in the post-WWII  era, will not continue on inertia alone. Future aid will necessarily be linked to these changes. Or it will disappear. In response to this challenge, new and more complex formulas for aid have been put forward (World bank 1997a, 1998b)

They stress using aid effectively to build governance while expanding market activity. What prospects are there for this emerging future aid regime? Three targets for aid have wide appeal among diverse elements in the donor and recipient communities. These are

  1. state strengthening,
  2. improved market management and
  • emergency safety nets.

These targets are recommended as problems for promoting future aid. Moreover, motivations of donors are favourably predisposed to these targets, since they appeal to overlapping  transnational coalitions and can be linked with benefits, as argued earlier.

Previous chapters provide background for this claim. Several of this volume’s authors e.g. Irma  Adelman in  and Tony Addison in – see the deterioration of states as a major obstacle to development. While aid effectiveness can be undermined by a poor set of policies, the right policy environment is chimera without a functioning state. After all, a state’s key role is to set up conditions for markets to operate. In particular, developing country markets are recognised as imperfect, so reforming markets is a second target. Finally, with widespread poverty and growing instability, refugees and internally displaced peoples have grown. Aid linked to emergency needs commands priority. This target represents a politically sustainable path for reinforcing international safety nets. It is an insurance mechanism to protect vital human and physical capital. The increased share of aid going to emergencies is likely to continue, since the conditions creating these emergencies continue with the growth of failed states and the large impact of natural disasters on crowded, ecologically vulnerable populations. Below, these three aid targets are considered in more detail.

5.4.1 Strengthening states

Political goals are important. There has been a continuous growth in the number of wars, especially civil wars, since 1950. The rise of internal wars has spilled across borders, involving neighbouring states and even out-of-region participants. The Balkans and the Great Lakes region of Africa are the most striking instances. The involvement of the  UN  in Somali, Cambodia and Southern Africa, and of  NATO  in the Balkan wars, suggests that containing armed conflict is a rising goal of Western states, especially when refugees threaten to destabilise surrounding states. This goal is only weakly undertaken in Africa, however, as Congo (Kinshasa) has become the locus for nine countries and a dozen  transnational insurgent groups to engage in fighting. From about 10 wars ongoing during 1945-5, there were perhaps 50 wars being waged in the nineties, most of them internal wars, and with enormous total death rates. This growth, encompassing conflicts from Sri Lanka and Afghanistan to Liberia and Colombia, is due to complex factors, including the prolonged duration of fighting, which became chronic in many areas. The prospect is that peace will be short-lived in areas afflicted with these  semi-legitimate,  semi-sovereign states.

This creates a case for targeting aid to the task of nurturing peaceful conditions in such anarchic conditions, as was made by Tony Addison. He sees a continuing role in areas where ‘incomplete peace’ lurks. The first concern is to improve the operation of polities so that ethnic rivalry, or the quick wealth from capturing resource rents, does not spawn conflict. Domestic conflicts endanger food supplies, basic institutions, and are a barrier to any long-term development (de  Soysa and  Gleditsch 1999). A second goal of targeting state failures is to discourage internal wars from generating refugees, promoting terrorist movements and increasing threats to stability, all of which can spread elsewhere. Exigencies of change, including ethnic conflict, nationalism, and globalisation, have caused the rise in conflict. The Rwanda case highlights failures of past aid to create conditions for peace. Peter  Uvin argues that when civil war flared in 1991-2, structural adjustment-based aid utterly failed to address growing political rifts.Projects focussed on food production, family planning, education and  health, were judged against narrow technical benchmarks.  Five billion dollars of foreign aid, delivered over 15 years, condoned official racism, ethnic identity cards, corruption, violence, hatred and human right abuses (Uvin 1998). Responsible government criteria as aid requirements, if credible and even modestly effective, would have averted this calamity.

Strengthening state institutions is also a prerequisite for securing increasingly important global collectives goods. Within the current world system, stability, predictability and recognition of rights are necessary properties of a state if environmental damage and international crime is to be confronted (Mittelman and Johnston 1999). The absence of terrorist threats, for example, can be linked to expected state compliance with rules that discourage and penalise terrorism. On the positive side, the aim is to make it possible for developing countries to deliver global goods on environment, human rights, migration control and health. Weak conflict-ridden states are the worst resource exploiters and make the largest mess for others. Efforts to strengthen such countries are supported by neighbouring states, by donor states’ foreign affairs ministries, military institutions and attentive publics and by environmental and humanitarian  NGOs. State strengthening efforts relate to governance/democracy projects, technical assistance for capacity building and basic budget support.

How to manage such aid successfully, however, is difficult (Lancaster 1999). Agreement on broad goals is not easily transferred into effective aid projects in this area of capacity building and state formation. The major question facing such aid use is not ‘what’ but ‘how’. For example, if ensuring rule-of-law rights are core elements in a successful state, then how is this achieved? Will assistance to judiciary organisations or police work? Strengthening government institutions with technical support and by privatisation, for example, are widely endorsed as ways to improve public sector performance. Yet Elliott Berg’s review of public enterprise reform  and Channing  Arndt’s discussion of technical assistance  suggest a paucity of success in strengthening efforts. Lessons for effective  aid reviewed earlier suggest that direct aid to officials and institutions may not work. If so, indirect aid to incumbent officials which strengthen them politically may be the best strategy (Kapur 1998 and Lancaster 1999). This strategy aims to improve intangible goods, such as legitimacy. Conceivably, infrastructure projects can achieve this, while constraining corrupt officials through using the aid to exact conditions making it harder for them to hide their money. Bank transparency around the world could also work to stop international opportunities for money laundering and tax evasion which plague states with bankrupt treasuries. So external pressures are needed, in order to prevent domestic rent-seeking or other self-serving tendencies by public or private agencies and these can be achieved through tough bureaucratic norms within  OECD  countries as well using aid to provide external sanctions.

Similarly, the importance of the rule-of-law within countries is a logical part of this target, but we need research help. The design of contextually sensitive and effective projects, including how they should relate to government, is a challenge. Deepening authoritative expectations is a complex task and may require long-term adaptive aid financing. Too little is said regarding its importance in the international context and in creating conditions for effective state regulation, to achieve, among other goals, the creation of private market guarantees and sensible privatisation of state enterprises. Stable expectations, based on a reliable civil service, are as crucial as a country’s laws, if the aim of aid is to promote economic stability.

5.4.2 Market management

The second promising direction for future aid is to target market construction and financial management. This is the next stage of structural adjustment. The barriers to privatisation and good policies identified in various earlier chapters need to be tackled. The  chapter by Irma  Adelman, for example, affirm that the desiderata of efficient markets – information, free participation, multiple actors – do not occur readily. State oversight, regulatory mechanisms and provision of corrective ingredients, such as information, are important elements in constructing markets. Markets are not selfprovisioning. They require external resources and constraints. The imperfections in markets, dramatised for Asian countries in financial crises of 1997-9, are striking. Aid can be targeted to address these imperfections, certainly in those countries with multiple banking problems, and with heavy debt. Financial markets are of special concern for securing improved frameworks, both to control panic instability and resolve excessive indebtedness.

The pattern of debt crises and economic downturn in the nineties moved from Mexico to affect a wide array of countries from Indonesia to Russia. And the deep indebtedness of Africa festers, as the failure of debt forgiveness programmes for the most heavily indebted poor states has failed.  The most poignant cases exist in Africa. The World Bank, the  IMF  and the  UN  agencies have all stressed for national governments to take the lead and initiate economic management that addresses their imbalances of globalisation. The basic taxation capacity of many countries is so crippled that they skew their economies toward taxing too heavily the most productive sectors, such as exports, as the easiest to reach. This distorts markets, and is unnecessary. Policies can be adopted that involve little bureaucratic costs and more decentralised arrangements. The revenue base for governments could be improved if national level corruption, both official and private, could be lowered.

5.4.3 Poverty and emergency safety net

The third target for aid is poverty and emergency safety nets. This theme coincides with commitments to poverty reduction at the  OECD  and the World Bank. Poverty is connected emotionally to emergency relief. International relief assistance plays the role of a safety net for the poorest countries and peoples. The rise in emergency aid coincides with the return to a poverty focus, which had been the central goal of aid in the seventies  prior to policy reform or the structural adjustment ascendance. The treatment of emergency aid as a special, unfortunate use of funds would be replaced by eliminating the emergency to development continuum in aid design. The targets are those poor vulnerable people whose climb from poverty can be set back decades by emergencies. Rescuing them with international assistance, when recipient countries lack the resources to do  this, can be linked to long-term strategies both analytically and institutionally. For example, in Bangladesh in 1998, the worst flood in the 20th Century threatened the  well-being of thirty million poor and causing $1.5 billion worth of damage. Aid provided by dozens of international agencies protected these endangered people from ruinous effects. The aid was channelled through (and strengthened poverty oriented) local institutions, both state agencies and non-governmental ones, such as the Grameen Bank. It supported local safety nets and averted the worst consequences of the flood for Bangladesh’ most impoverished populations (Kahn 1999).

Early warning systems for emergencies also offer a link between information about the conditions of the poor, their needs, and their abilities to adapt to new opportunities following a shock to their lives, a consideration that may offset the rapid expansion of information that otherwise increases rich and poor divides (World Bank The third target for aid is poverty and emergency safety nets). This theme coincides with commitments to poverty reduction at the  OECD  and the World Bank. Poverty is connected emotionally to emergency relief. International relief assistance plays the role of a safety net for the poorest countries and peoples. The rise in emergency aid coincides with the return to a poverty focus, which had been the central goal of aid in the seventies  prior to policy reform or the structural adjustment ascendance. The treatment of emergency aid as a special, unfortunate use of funds would be replaced by eliminating the emergency to development continuum in aid design. The targets are those poor vulnerable people whose climb from poverty can be set back decades by emergencies. Rescuing them with international assistance, when recipient countries lack the resources to do  this, can be linked to long-term strategies both analytically and institutionally. For example, in Bangladesh in 1998, the worst flood in the 20th Century in threatened the  well-being of thirty million poor and causing $1.5 billion worth of damage. Aid provided by dozens of international agencies protected these endangered people from ruinous effects. The aid was channelled through (and strengthened povertyoriented) local institutions, both state agencies and non-governmental ones, such as the Grameen Bank. It supported local safety nets and averted the worst consequences of the flood for Bangladesh’ most impoverished populations (Kahn 1999).  Early warning systems for emergencies also offer a link between information about the conditions of the poor, their needs, and their abilities to adapt to new opportunities following a shock to their lives, a consideration that may  the rapid expansion of information that otherwise increases rich and poor divides (World Bank 1998b).

 

Course Credits

Acemoglu, Daron, and Fabrizio Zilibotti (1994) ‘Was Prometheus unbound by chance?’ Mimeo, MIT

Acemoglu, Daron, and Joshua Angrist (2001) ‘How large are human-capital externalities? Evidence from compulsory schooling laws.’ In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Vol. 15, ed. Ben Bernanke and

Kenneth Rogoff (Cambridge and London: MIT Press) pp. 9—59

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson (2001) ‘The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation.’ American Economic Review 91(5), 1369—1401

Aghion, Philippe, and Patrick Bolton (1997) ‘A trickle-down theory of growth and development with debt overhang.’ Review of Economic Studies 64(2), 151—72

Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt (1992) ‘A model of growth through creative destruction.’ Econometrica 60(2), 323—351

Aghion, Philippe, Peter Howitt, and David Mayer-Foulkes (2003) ‘The effect of financial development onconvergence: Theory and evidence.’ Mimeo, Harvard University

Aiyagari, S. Rao (1994) ‘Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 569—684

Aleem, Irfan (1990) ‘Imperfect information, screening and the costs of informal lending: A study of a rural credit market in Pakistan.’ World Bank Economic Review 3, 329—349

Alesina, Alberto, and Dani Rodrik (1994) ‘Distributive politics and economic growth.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(2), 465—490

Anderberg, S., and E. Clark, (2012) ‘The green and sustainable øresund region: Eco-branding Copenhagen and Malmö’ In I. Vojnovic(ed). Sustainability: A global urban context. Michigan State University, 591-610

Anderson, C. (2012) Makers: the next undistributed revolution

Anderson, Siwan, and Jean-Marie Baland (2002) ‘The economics of roscas and intrahousehold resource allocation.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 963—995

Angeletos, George-Marios, and Laurent Calvet (2003) ‘Idiosyncratic production risk, growth and the business cycle.’ Mimeo, MIT

Aportela, Fernando (1998) ‘The effects of financial access on savings by low-income people.’ Mimeo, MIT

Appleton, S., A. Bigsten-P. Collier-S. Dercon M. Fafchamps B. Gauthier J.W. Gunning A. Isaksson A. Oduro R. Oostendorp C. Pattillo M. Soderbom F. Teal, and A. Zeufack (1998) ‘Rates of return on physical and human capital in Africa’s manufacturing sector.’ Working Paper WPS98.12, University of Oxford Centre for the Study of African Economies

Appleton, S., J. Hoddinott, and J. Knight (1996) ‘Primary education as an input to post-primary education: A neglected benefit.’ Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 58, 209—217

Appleton, Simon, Arne Bigsten, and Damiano Manda Kulundu (1999) ‘Educational expansion and economic decline’: Returns to education in Kenya 1978-1995.’ Working Paper WPS99.06, University of Oxford Centre for the Study of African Economies

Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen Bond (1991) ‘Some tests of specification for panel data’: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations.’ Review of Economic Studies 58(2), 277—297

Banerjee, Abhijit V. (1992) ‘A simple model of herd behavior.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 797—817

–(2001) ‘The two poverties.’ Nordic Journal of Political Economy 26(2), 129—141

–(2003a) ‘Contracting constraints, credit markets and economic development.’ In Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Eighth World Congress, Vol. III, ed. L. Hansen

–Dewatripont, M. and S. Turnovsky (Cambridge University Press), (2003b) ‘Educational policy and the economics of the family.’ Mimeo, MIT

Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Andrew Newman (1991) ‘Risk bearing and the theory of income distribution.’Review of Economic Studies 58(2), 211—235

–(1993) ‘Occupational choice and the process of development.’ Journal of Political Economy 101(2), 274—298

Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Esther Duflo (2000) ‘Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: A study of the indian software industry.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3), 989—1017

–(2003a) ‘Do firms want to borrow more? Testing credit constraints using a directed lending program.’ Working Paper 2003-5, Bureau for Research in Economic Analysis of Development

–(2003b) ‘Inequality and growth: What can the data say?’ Journal of Economic Growth 8, 267—299

Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Kaivan Munshi (2004) ‘How efficiently is capital allocated? Evidence from the knitted garment industry in Tirupur.’ Review of Economic Studies 71(1), 19—42

Banerjee, Abhijit V., Esther Duflo, and Kaivan Munshi (2003) ‘The (mis)allocation of capital.’ Journal of the European Economic Association 1(2—3), 484—494

Banerjee, Abhijit V., Paul Gertler, and Maitreesh Ghatak (2002) ‘Empowerment and efficiency: Tenancy reform in West Bengal.’ Journal of Political Economy 110(2), 239—280

Bardhan, Pranab, and Christopher Udry (1999) Development microeconomics (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press)

Barro, Robert J. (1974) ‘Are government bonds net wealth?’ Journal of Political Economy 82(6), 1095—1117

–(1991) ‘Economic growth in a cross section of countries.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2), 407—443

–(2000) ‘Inequality and growth in a panel of countries.’ Journal of Economic Growth 5(1), 5—32

Barro, Robert J., and Jong-Wha Lee (2000) ‘International data on educational attainment updates and implications.’ Working Paper 7911, National Bureau of Economic Research, September

Barro, Robert J., and Xavier Sala-I-Martin (1995) Economic Growth (New York: McGraw Hill)

Bartik, T.J (2005) ‘Solving the problems of economic development incentives’ in Growth and Change. 36:2, 139-166

Basta, S., Soekirman-D. Karyadi, and N. Scrimshaw (1979) ‘Iron deficiency anemia and the productivity of adult males in Indonesia.’ American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32(4), 916—925

Becker, Gary (1981) ‘A Treatise on the Family’ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)

Benabou, Roland (1996) ‘Inequality and growth.’ In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1996, ed. Ben Bernanke and Julio J. Rotemberg (Cambridge and London: MIT Press) pp. 11—73

Benhabib, Jess, and A. Rustichini (1998) ‘Social conflict and growth.’ Journal of Economic Growth 1(1), 143—158

Benhabib, Jess, and Mark M. Spiegel (1994) ‘The role of human capital in economic development: Evidence from aggregate cross-country data.’ Journal of Monetary Economics 34(2), 143—174

Bennell, Paul (1996) ‘Rates of return to education: Does the conventional pattern prevail in sub-saharan Africa?’ World Development 24(1), 183—199

Berg, L. Van den, Meer, Van den, and  L. Carvalho (2014) ‘Cities as engines of sustainable competiveness’ European Urban Policy in Practice

Besley, Timothy (1995) ‘Savings, credit and insurance.’ In Handbook of Development Economics, ed J. Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan, vol. 3A (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science) chapter 6, pp. 2123—2207

Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case (1994) ‘Diffusion as a learning process:Evidence from HYV cotton.’Discussion Paper 174, RPDS, Princeton University

Bigsten, Arne, Anders Isaksson Mans Soderbom-Paul Collier Et Al (2000) ‘Rates of return on physical and human capital in Africa’s manufacturing sector.’ Economic Development and Cultural Change 48(4), 801—827

Bikhchandani, Sushil, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch (1992) ‘A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades.’ Journal of Political Economy 100(5), 992—1026

Bils, Mark, and Peter Klenow (2000) ‘Does schooling cause growth?’ American Economic Review 90(5), 1160—1183

Binswanger, Hans, and Mark Rosenzweig (1986) ‘Behavioural and material determinants of production relations in agriculture.’ Journal of Development Studies 22(3), 503—539

Blanchflower, David, and Andrew Oswald (1998) ‘What makes an entrepreneur?’ Journal of Labor Economics 16(1), 26—60

Blom, Andreas, Dorte Verner, and Lauritz Holm-Nielsen (2001) ‘Education, earnings, and inequality in Brazil, 1982-98: Implications for education policy.’ Working Paper 2686, World Bank

Bottomley, A. (1963) ‘The cost of administering private loans in underdeveloped rural areas.’ Oxford Economic Papers 15(2), 154—163

Bourguignon, Francois, and Pierre-Andre Chiappori (1992) ‘Collective models of household behavior.’European Economic Review 36, 355—364

Bowen, A., S. Fankhauser, N. Stern, D. Zenghelis (2009) ‘An outline of the case for a ‘green’ stimulus’. Policy brief, Grantha  Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment/Centre for Climate Change Economics and policy, London School of Economics and Political Scienxe, London

Buera, Fancisco (2003) ‘A dynamic model of entrepreneurship with borrowing constraints.’ Mimeo, University of Chicago

Cagetti, Marco, and M. De Nardi (2003) ‘Entrepreneurship, frictions and wealth.’ Staff Report 324, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Carroll, Christopher (1997) ‘Buffer-stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis.’ Quar-terly Journal of Economics 112, 1—56

Carvalho, L (2014) ‘Smart cities for scratch? A socio-technical perspective in Cambridge’. Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, online first: doi:10.1093/gres/rsuolo

Carvalho, L., Placido Santos, L. Winden, W. Van (2014) ‘knowledge spaces and places from the perspective of a born-global startup in the field of urban technology in Expert systems with Applications’, 41, 5647-5655

Carvalho, Irineu (2000) ‘Household income as a determinant of child labor and school enrollment in Brazil: Evidence from a social security reform.’ Mimeo, MIT

Case, Anne, and Christina Paxson (2001) ‘Mothers and others: Who invests in children’s health?’ Journal of Health Economics 20(3), 301—328

Case, Anne, Christina Paxson, and Joseph Ableidinger (2002) ‘Orphans in Africa.’ Working Paper 9213, National Bureau of Economic Research

Case, Anne, I-Fen Lin, and Sara McLanahan (2000) ‘How hungry is the selfish gene?’ Economic Journal 110(466), 781—804

Caselli, Francesco, and N. Gennaioli (2002) ‘Dynastic management.’ Mimeo, Harvard University

CEMR, (2012) Press release: Further decline in European subnational investments in 2011’. http://www.ccre.org/docs_press_note_UE_EN.pdf

Coate, Stephen, and Martin Ravallion (1993) ‘Reciprococity without commitment: Characterization and performance of informal insurance arrangements.’ Journal of Development Economics 40, 1—24

Cole, Harold, George Mailath, and Andrew Postlewaite (1992) ‘Social norms, savings behavior and growth.’ Journal of Political Economy 100(6), 1092—1126

–(1998) ‘Class systems and the enforcement of social norms.’ Journal of Public Economics 70(1), 5—35

–(2001) ‘Investment and concern for relative position.’ Review of Economic Design 6, 241—261

Conley, Tim, and Christopher Udry (2003) ‘Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana.’ Mimeo, Northwestern University

Dasgupta, A. (1989) ‘Reports on Informal Credit Markets in India: Summary’ (New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy)

Dasgupta, Partha, and Debraj Ray (1986) ‘Inequality as a determinant of malnutrition and unemployment: Theory.’ The Economic Journal 96(384), 1011—1034

Deaton, Angus (1992) ‘Understanding Consumption’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

–(1997) ‘The Analysis of Household Surveys’ (World Bank, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development)

Deaton, Angus, and Christina Paxson (1994) ‘Intertemporal choice and inequality.’ Journal of PoliticalEconomy 1-2(3), 437—467

Deininger, Klaus, and Lyn Squire (1996) ‘A new data set measuring income inequality.’ World Bank Economic Review 10, 565—591

Deloitte, (2014) 2014 Global health care sector outlook, shared challenges, shared opportunities’. http://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/life-sciences-andhealthcare/articles/2014-global-health-care-outlook.html

Deloitte, (2009) ‘Medical tourism: update and implications’. http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20assets/documents/us_chs_medicaltourism_111209_web.pdf

Djankov, Simeon, Rafael La Porta Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer (2002) ‘The regulation of entry.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1), 1—37

–(2003) ‘Courts.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(2), 453—518

Do, Toan, and Laksmi Iyer (2003) ‘Land rights and economic development: Evidence from Vietnam.’ Mimeo, Harvard Business School

Dreze, Jean, and Geeta Gandhi Kingdon (1999) ‘School participation in rural India.’ Working Paper 18, LSE Development Economics Discussion Paper Series

Drijkstra, L. (2013) ‘Why investing more in the capital can lead to less growth in Cambridge’. Jornal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6:2, 251-268

Duflo, Esther (2001) ‘The medium run effects of educational expansion: Evidence from a large school construction program in Indonesia.’ Working Paper 2003-2, Bureau for Research in Economic Analysis of Development. forthcoming, Journal of Developemnt Economics

–(2003) ‘Poor but rational.’ Mimeo, MIT

Duflo, Esther, Michael Kremer, and James Robinson (2003) ‘Understanding technology adoption: Fertilizer in Western Kenya, preliminary results from field experiments.’ Mimeo, MIT

Duncan Thomas, Elizabeth Frankenberg, Jed Friedman Jean-Pierre Habicht, and Et Al (2003) ‘Iron deficiency and the well being of older adults: Early results from a randomized nutrition intervention.’ Mimeo, UCLA

Durlauf, Steven (1993) ‘Nonergodic economic growth.’ Review of Economic Studies 60(2), 349—366

Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum (2001) ‘Trade in capital goods.’ European Economic Review 45(7), 1195—1235

Edmonds, Eric (2004) ‘Does illiquidity alter child labor and schooling decisions? evidence from household responses to anticipated cash transfers in South Africa.’ Working Paper 10265, National Bureau of Economic Research

Ellison, Glenn, and Drew Fudenberg (1993) ‘Rules of thumbs for social learning.’ Journal of Political Economy 101(4), 93—126

Ellison, Glenn, and Edward Glaeser (1997) ‘Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach.’ Journal of Political Economy 105(5), 889—927

–(1999) ‘Geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration?’ American Economic Review 89(2), 311-316

Espon and Tecnalia (2013) ‘GREECO-Territorial Potentials for a Green or Economy’ (Draft). Final Report, Version 22/11/2013

Eswaran, Mukesh, and Ashok Kotwal (1985) ‘A theory of contractual structure in agriculture.’ American Economic Review 75(3), 352—367

Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdoff (2000) ‘The dynamics of innovation: from National System and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations’ In. Research policy 29:2, 109-123

European Commission, (2014) ‘Green employment intiative: tapping into the job creation potential of the green economy’. COM (2014) 446 final. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/reydoc/rep/1/2014/EN/1-2014-EN-F1-1.pdf

European Commission, and (2014) ‘Digital Economy: facts and figures’. TAXUD D1/JT. http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/good_governance_mattets/digital/2014-03-13_fact_figures.Pdf

European Commission, (2011) Cities of tomorrow: Challenges, visions, ways forward. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sourrces/docgener/studies/PDF/citiesoftomorrow/citoesoftomorrow_final.pdf

European Commission, (2010) ‘A Digital Agenda for Europe’. COM 245, final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010DCO245R(01)&from=EN

Fafchamps, Marcel (2000) ‘Ethnicity and credit in African manufacturing.’ Journal of Development Economics 61, 205—235

Fafchamps, Marcel, and Susan Lund (2003) ‘Risk-sharing networks in rural Philippines.’ Review of Eco-nomic Studies 71(2), 261—287

Fazzari, S., G. Hubbard, and B. Petersen (1988) ‘Financing constraints and corporate investment.’ Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 0(1), 141—195

Filippov, S. (2014) ‘Data -driven business models: powering start-ups in the digital age. http://www.lisboncouncil.net/publication/publication/119-data-riven-business-models-powering-startups-in-digital-age.html

Forbes, Kristin J. (2000) ‘A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth.’ American Economic Review 90(4), 869—887

Foster, Andrew D., and Mark R. Rosenzweig (1995) ‘Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture.’ Journal of Political Economy 103(6), 1176—1209

–(1996) ‘Technical change and human-capital returns and investments: Evidence from the green revolution.’ American Economic Review 86(4), 931—953

–(1999) ‘Missing women, the marriage market and economic growth.’ Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania

Foster, Andrew D., and Mark Rosenzweig (2000) ‘Technological change and the distribution of schooling: Evidence from green revolution in India.’ Mimeo, Brown University

Frazer, Garth (2001) ‘Linking firms and workers: Heterogeneous labor and returns to education.’ Mimeo, Yale University

Freeman, Richard (1986) ‘Demand for education.’ In Handbook of Labor Economics, ed. O. Ashenfelter and A. Layard, vol. 1 (Netherlands: Elsevier Publishers)

Freeman, Richard, and Remco Oostendorp (2001) ‘The occupational wages around the world data file.’ International Labour Review 140(4), 379—401

Funkhouser, Edward (1998) ‘Changes in the returns to education in Costa Rica.’ Journal of Development Economics 57, 289—317

Galor, Oded, and Joseph Zeira (1993) ‘Income distribution and macroeconomics.’ Review of Economic Studies 60(1), 35—52

Gelos, R. Gaston, and Alejandro Werner (2002) ‘Financial liberalization, credit constraints, and collateral: Investment in the Mexican manufacturing sector.’ Journal of Development Economics 67(1), 1—27

Gertler, Paul, and Jonathan Gruber (2002) ‘Insuring consumption against illness.’ American Economic Review 92(1), 51—76

Gertler, Paul J., and Simone Boyce (2002) ‘An experiment in incentive-based welfare: The impact of PROGESA on health in Mexico.’ Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley

Ghatak, Maitreesh, Massimo Morelli, and Tomas Sjostrom (2001) ‘Occupational choice and dynamic incentives.’ Review of Economic Studies 68(4), 781—810

–(2002) ‘Credit rationing, wealth inequality, and allocation of talent.’ Mimeo, London School of Economics

Ghate, Prabhu (1992) ‘Informal Finance: Some Findings from Asia’ (Oxford; New York; Toronto and Hong Kong: Oxford University Press for the Asian Development Bank)

Gibbs, D., and K. O’Neill (2014) ‘The green economy sustainability transitions and transitions regipn: a case of Boston’. in: Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography 96(3), 201-216

Global Wellness Institute, (2014) ‘The global Wellness tourism economy. http://www.globalwellnesssummit.com/images/pdf/wellness_tourism_economy_exec_sum_final_10022013.pdf

Goldstein, Markus, and Christopher Udry (1999) ‘Agricultural innovation and resource management in Ghana.’ Mimeo, Yale University; Final Report to IFPRI under MP17

–(2002) ‘Gender, land rights and agriculture in Ghana.’ Mimeo, Yale University

Greenwood, Jeremy, and Boyan Jovanovic (1999) ‘The information technology revolution and the stock market.’ American Economic Review 89(2), 116—22

Grossman, Gene, and Elhanan Helpman (1991) ‘Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy’ (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)

Gugerty, Mary Kay (2000) ‘You can’t save alone: Testing theories of rotating savings and credit associations.’ Mimeo, Harvard University

Hamdouch, A., and M, -H. Depret (2010) ‘Policy integration strategy and the development of the “green economy” foundations and imlementatipn patterns’.’ In: Management 53:4, 473-490

Hart, O., and J. Moore (1994) ‘A theory of debt based on inalienability of human capital.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 841—879

Heston, Alan, Robert Summers, and Bettina Aten (2002) ‘Penn World Table version 6.1.’ Technical Report, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania

Hsieh, Chang-Tai (1999) ‘Productivity growth and factor prices in east asia.’ American Economic Review 89(2), 133—138

Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Peter J. Klenow (2003) ‘Relative prices and relative prosperity.’ Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley

Jacoby, Hanan (2002) ‘Is there an intrahousehold flypaper effect? Evidence from a school feeding program.’ Economic Journal 112(476), 196—221

Jeong, Hyeok, and Robert Townsend (2003) ‘Growth and inequality: Model evaluation based on an estimation-calibration strategy.’ Mimeo, University of Southern California

Johnson, Simon, John McMillan, and Christopher Woodruff (2002) ‘Property rights and finance.’ American Economic Review 92(5), 1335—1356

Jovanovic, Boyan, and Peter Rousseau (2003) ‘Specific capital and the division of rents.’ Mimeo, NewYork University

Jovanovic, Boyan, and Rafael Rob (1997) ‘Solow vs. Solow: Machine prices and development.’ WorkingPaper 5871, National Bureau of Economic Research

Julian, C (2014) ‘Creating Local Energy Economies: Lessons from Germany’. in Respublica essays, July 2014

Kanbur, Ravi (1979) ‘Of risk taking and the personal distribution of income.’ Journal of Political Economy 87, 769—797

Karlan, Dean (2003) ‘Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions.’ Mimeo, Princeton University

Kihlstrom, R., and J. Laffont (1979) ‘A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion.’ Journal of Political Economy 87, 719—748

Knack, Stephen, and Philip Keefer (1995) ‘Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures.’ Economics and Politics 7(3), 207—227

Kremer, Michael, and Edward Miguel (2003) ‘The illusion of sustainability.’ Mimeo, University of Cali-fornia, Berkeley

Kremer, Michael, Sylvie Moulin, and Robert Namunyu (2003) ‘Decentralization: A cautionary tale.’ Mimeo, Harvard University

Krishnan, Pramila, Tesfaye Gebre Selassie, and Stefan Dercon (1998) ‘The urban labour market during structural adjustment: Ethiopia 1990-1997.’ Working Paper WPS98.9, University of Oxford Centre for the Study of African Economies

Krueger, Alan, and Mikael Lindahl (1999) ‘Education for growth: Why and for whom?’ Mimeo, Princeton University

Krueger, Anne (1967) ‘Factor endowments and per capital income differences among countries.’ Economic Journal 78, 641—659

Krussel, Per, and Anthony Smith (1998) ‘Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy.’ Journal of Political Economy 106(5), 867—896

La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes-Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny (1998) ‘Law and finance.’ Journal of Political Economy 106(6), 1113—1155

Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Mohamed Salah Matoussi (1995) ‘Moral hazard, financial constraints and sharecropping in El Oulja.’ Review of Economic Studies 62(3), 381—399

Laibson, David (1991) ‘Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 62, 443-477

Levine, Ross, and David Renelt (1992) ‘A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions.’ American Economic Review 82(4), 942—963

Li, Hongyi, and Heng-fu Zou (1998) ‘Income inequality is not harmful for growth: Theory and evidence.’ Review of Development Economics 2(3), 318—334

Li, R., X. Chen H. Yan-P. Deurenberg L. Garby, and J.G. Hautvast (1994) ‘Functional consequences of iron supplementation in iron-deficient female cotton workers in Beijing China.’ American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 59, 908—913

Linköping, (2001). ‘Miljöpolicy for Linköping Kommum’. February 2001

Lloyd-Ellis, H., and D. Bernhardt (2000) ‘Enterprise, inequality and economic development.’ Review of Economic Studies 67(1), 147—169

Long, Sharon K. (1991) ‘Do the school nutrition programs supplement household food expenditures ’Journal of Human Resources 26, 654—678

Lopez-Acevedo, Gladys (2001) ‘Evolution of earnings and rates of returns to education in Mexico.’ Working Paper 2691, World Bank Education Child Labor, Returns To Schooling Series

Loury, Glenn C. (1981) ‘Intergenerational transfers and the distribution of earnings.’ Econometrica 49(4), 843—867

Lucas, Robert (1990) ‘Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries?’ American Economic Review 80(2), 92—96

Lundberg, Shelly, and Robert Pollak (1994) ‘Noncooperative bargaining models of marriage.’ American Economic Review 84(2), 132—137

–(1996) ‘Bargaining and distribution in marriage.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(4), 139—158

Mankiw, Gregory, David Romer, and David Weil (1992) ‘A contribution to the empirics of economic growth.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2), 407—437

Manski, Charles (1993) ‘Identification of exogenous social effects: The reflection problem.’ Review of Economic Studies 60, 531—542

Mason, A., and S. Khandker (1995) ‘Household schooling decisions in Tanzania.’ Mimeo, World Bank

Matsuyama, Kiminori (2000) ‘Endogenous inequality.’ Review of Economic Studies 67(4), 743—759

(2003) ‘On the rise and fall of class societies.’ Mimeo, Northwestern University

Mauro, Paolo (1995) ‘Corruption and growth.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3), 681—712

McCann P, (2015) ‘The Regional and Urban Policy of the European Union: Cohesion, Results-Orientation and Smart Specialisation’

McKenzie, David, and Christopher Woodruff (2003) ‘Do entry costs provide an empirical basis for poverty traps? Evidence from Mexican microenterprises.’ Working Paper 2003-20, Bureau for Research in Economic Analysis of Development

McKinsey Global Institute, (2001) ‘India: The growth imperative.’ Report, McKinsey Global Institute

Miguel, Edward, and Michael Kremer (2003) ‘Networks, social learning, and technology adoption: The case of deworming drugs in Kenya.’ Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley

–(2004) ‘Worms: Identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities.’ Econometrica 72(1), 159—218

Mookherjee, Dilip, and Debraj Ray (2002) ‘Contractual structure and wealth accumulation.’ American Economic Review 92(4), 818—849

(2003) ‘Persistent inequality.’ Review of Economic Studies 70(2), 369—393

Morduch, Jonathan (1993) ‘Risk production and saving: Theory and evidence from Indian households.’ Mimeo, Harvard University

Mulligan, M and D. Card (2014) Sizing the EU app economy. GIGAOM Research

Munshi, Kaivan (2003) ‘Social learning in a heterogeneous population: Technology diffusion in the Indian green revolution.’ Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania

Munshi, Kaivan, and Jacques Myaux (2002) ‘Development as a process of social change: An application to the fertility transition.’ Mimeo, Brown University

Munshi, Kaivan, and Mark Rosenzweig (2004) ‘Traditional institutions meet the modern world: Caste, gender, and schooling choice in a globalizing economy.’ Mimeo, Brown University

Muro, M., J. Rothwell and D. Saha (2011) ‘Sizing the green economy: a national and regional green jobs assessments’. Brookings Institution, Washington DC

Murphy, Kevin, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny (1989) ‘Industrialization and the big push.’ Journal of Political Economy 97(5), 1003—1026

–(1995) ‘The allocation of talent: Implications for growth.’ In The economic analysis of rent seeking, ed. Robert Tollison and Roger Congleton, vol. 49 of Elgar Reference Collection: International Library of Critical Writings in Economics (Ashgate; Elgar) pp. 301—328

Murshid, K. (1992) ‘Informal credit markets in Bangladesh agriculture: Bane or boon?’ In ‘Sustainable Agricultural Development: The role of international cooperation: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of Agricultural Economists, held at Tokyo, Japan, 22-29 August 1991’ (Aldershot, U.K.: Dartmouth; Brookfield, Vt: Ashgate) pp. 657—68

Mwabu, G., and T. Schultz (1995) ‘Wage premia for education and location by gender and race in South Africa.’ Mimeo, Yale University

Nevens, F., N. Frantzeskaki, L. Gorissen and D. Lourbach (2013) ‘Urban Transportation Labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities’ in. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50(2), 111-122

Newman, Andrew (1995) ‘Risk-bearing and ‘Knightian’ entrepreneurship.’ Mimeo, Columbia University

OECD, (2014) ‘Measuring the digital economy: a new perspective’ . http://www.oecd.org/stilmeasuring-the-digital-economy-9789264221-en.html

OECD, (2014) ‘Regional Outlook, 2014-Regional and Cities: Where Policies and people Meet’. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201415-en

OECD/ European Commission, (2012) ‘Policy brief on senoir entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial activities in Europe’. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/lead/EUEMP12A1201_Broxhure_Entreprenurial_Acticities_EN_07.0_accessible.pdf

Olley, G. Steven, and Ariel Pakes (1996) ‘The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry.’ Econometrica 64(6), 1263—1297

on Macroeconomics, Commission, and Health (2001) ‘Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development’: Report (Geneva: World Health Organization)

Östsam, (2011) ‘Regionbeskrivning Östergötland, http://www.ostsam.se

Parente, Stephen, and Edward Prescott (1994) ‘Barriers to technology adoption and development.’ Journal of Political Economy 102(2), 298—321

–(2000) ‘Barriers to Riches’: Walras-Pareto Lectures, vol. 3 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)

Paulson, Anna, and Robert Townsend (2003) ‘Entrepreneurship and financial constraints in thailand.’ Mimeo, Northwestern University, forthcoming in Journal of Corporate Finance

Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini (1991) ‘Is inequality harmful for growth? Theory and evidence.’ American Economic Review 48, 600—621

Piketty, Thomas (1997) ‘The dynamics of the wealth distribution and the interest rate with credit rationing.’ The Review of Economic Studies 64(2), 173—189

Powell, Christine, Sally Grantham-McGregor, and M. Elston (1983) ‘An evaluation of giving the Jamaican government school meal to a class of children.’ Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 37C, 381—388

Powell, Christine, Sally Walker-Susan Chang, and Sally Grantham-McGregor (1998) ‘Nutrition and education: A randomized trial of the effects of breakfast in rural primary school children.’ American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 68, 873—879

Psacharopoulos, George (1973) ‘Returns to Education: An International Comparison’ (San Francisco: Jossy Bass-Elsevier)

Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. Doll, C.N.H. Balaban, O. Jiang, P. Dreyfus, M. Suwa, A. Moreno R. Peñaranda, P. Dirgahayani (2013) ‘Green economy and governance in cities: assessing good governance in key urban processes’ in: Journal of Cleaner Production 58: 138-152

–(1985) ‘Returns to education: A further international update and implications.’ Journal of Human Resources 20(4), 583—604

–(1994) ‘Returns to investments in education: a global update.’ World Development 22(9), 1325—1343

–(2002) ‘Returns to investment in education: A global update.’ World Development 22(9), 1325—1343

Qian, Nancy (2003) ‘Missing women and the price of tea in china.’ Mimeo, MIT

Quadrini, Vincenco (1999) ‘The importance of entrepreneurship for wealth concentration and mobility.’ Review of Income and Wealth 45, 1—19

Rabari, C and M. Storper (2014) ‘The digital skin of cities:  urban theory and research and metered city, ubiuitous computing and ‘big data’ in Cambridge’. Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, rsu021

Rauch, James (1993) ‘Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: Evidence from the cities.’ Journal of Urban Economics 34(3), 380—400

Ravallion, Martin, and Shubham Chaudhuri (1997) ‘Risk and insurance in village India: Comment.’ Econometrica 65(1), 171—184

Ray, Debraj (1998) Development Economics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press)

–(2003) ‘Aspirations, poverty and economic change.’ Mimeo, New York University

Restuccia, Diego, and Carlos Urrutia (2001) ‘Relative prices and investment rates.’ Journal of Monetary Economics 47(1), 93—121

Richardson, R.B (2013) ‘Building a Green economy perspectives from ecological economics.’ Michigan State University Press Lansing, Michigan

Rosenstein-Rodan, Paul N. (1943) ‘Problems of industrialization of eastern and south-eastern Europe.’ Economic Journal 53, 202—211

Rosenzweig, Mark R., and Hans Binswanger (1993) ‘Wealth, weather risk and the composition and profitability of agricultural investments.’ Economic Journal 103(416), 56—78

Rosenzweig, Mark R., and Kenneth I. Wolpin (1993) ‘Credit market constraints, consumption smoothing, and the accumulation of durable production assets in low-income countries: Investments in bullocks in India.’ Journal of Political Economy 101(21), 223—244

Rosenzweig, Mark R., and T. Paul Schultz (1982) ‘Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intrafamily resource distribution: Child survival in rural India.’ American Economic Review 72(4), 803—815

Sala-I-Martin, Xavier (1997) ‘I just ran four million regressions.’ Working Paper 6252, National Bureau of Economic Research

SCb Statistiska centralbyrån(n.d), statistics Sweden. www.scb.se

Schultz, T. Paul (1994) ‘Human capital investment in women and men.’ Occasioinal Paper 44, International Center for Economic Growth

–(2001) ‘School subsidies for the poor: Eevaluating the Mexican PROGRESA poverty program.’ Mimeo, Yale University, forthcoming in Journal of Development Economics

Shaban, Radwan (1987) ‘Testing between competing models of sharecropping.’ Journal of Political Economy 95(5), 893—920

Skiba, A. K. (1978) ‘Optimal growth with a convex-concave production function.’ Econometrica 46, 527—539

Stiglitz, J. (1969) ‘The effects of income, wealth, and capital gains taxation on risk-taking.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 83(2), 263—283

–(1974) ‘Incentives and risk sharing in sharecropping.’ Review of Economic Studies 41(2), 219—255

Strauss, John, and Duncan Thomas (1995) ‘Human resources: Empirical modeling of household and family decisions.’ In Handbook of Development Economics, ed. Jere Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan, vol. 3A (Amsterdam: North Holland) chapter 34, pp. 1885—2023

Strauss, John, and Duncan Thomas (1998) ‘Health, nutrition, and economic development.’ Journal of Economic Literature 36(2), 766—817

Svensson, Jakob (1998) ‘Investment, property rights and political instability: Theory and evidence.’ European Economic Review 42(7), 1317—1341

Thomas, Duncan (2001) ‘Health, nutrition and economic prosperity: A microeconomic perspective.’ Working Paper, Bulletin of the World Working Paper 7, Working Group 1, WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health

Thomas, Duncan, and Elizabeth Frankenberg (2002) ‘Health, nutrition and prosperity: A microeconomic perspective.’ Bulletin of the World Health Organization 80(2), 106—113

Timberg, Thomas, and C. V. Aiyar (1984) ‘Informal credit markets in India.’ Economic Development and Cultural Change 33(1), 43—59

Tirole, Jean (1996) ‘A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistance of corruption and to firm quality).’ Review of Economic Studies 63(1), 1—22

Townsend, Robert (1994) ‘Risk and insurance in village India.’ Econometrica 62(4), 539—591

–(1995) ‘Financial systems in Northern Thai villages.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(4), 1011—1046

Townsend, Robert, and Kenichi Ueda (2003) ‘Financial deepening, inequality, and growth: A model-based quantitative evaluation.’ Mimeo, University of Chicago

Udry, Christopher (1990) ‘Credit markets in Northern Nigeria: Credit as insurance in a rural economy.’ World Bank Economic Review 4(3), 251—69

–(1996) ‘Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household.’ Journal of Political Economy 101(5), 1010—1045

–(2003) ‘A note on the returns to capital in a developing country.’ Mimeo, Yale

UNEP, (2011) ‘Towards a Green Economy: Pathway to sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication – A synthesis for Policy makers’. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.

United Nations Development Program (2001) ‘Human development report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development’ (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press)

Van Winden, W., E. Braun, A. Otgaar, and J.J. Witte (2014) ‘Urban Innovation Systems, what makes them tick?’ http://www.routledge.com/books/details/97804157277851

Van Winden, W., L. De Carvalho, E. Van Taijl, J. Van Hauren and L. Van den Berg (2012) ‘Creating Knowledge Locations: innovations and integration challenges’

Van Winden, W., L. van den Berg, L. Carvalho and E. van Taijl (2010) ‘Manufacturing in the ‘new urban economy

Van Winden, W., L. van den Berg and P.M.J. Pol (2007) ‘European cities in the knowledge economy: towards a typology’ in Urban Studies’, 44:3, 525-530

Vere, James (2001) ‘Education, technology and the wage structure in Taiwan, 1979-1998.’ Mimeo, Princeton University

Vermeersch, Christel (2002) ‘School meals, educational achievement and school competition: Evidence from a randomized evaluation.’ Mimeo, Harvard University

Young, Alwyn (1995) ‘The tyranny of numbers: Confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3), 641—680

Zeldes, Stephen (1989) ‘Consumption and liquidity constraints: An empirical investigation.’ Journal of Political Economy 97(2), 305—346

 
Copyright © Portalay 2020. All rights reserved.